بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخۀ فارسی سنجۀ فابینگ شریک زندگی در همسران ایرانی

نوع مقاله : پژوهش اصیل

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مشاوره خانواده، گروه مشاوره، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه مشاوره، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران. m.rostami@uok.ac.ir

3 دانشیار گروه مشاوره، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.

چکیده

مقدمه: گوشی‌های هوشمند و اینترنت، با پیشرفت فنّاوری، رابطۀ میان انسان‌ها را به شیوه چشمگیری دگرگون کرده‌اند. بااین‌حال یکی از پدیده‌های نورسیده و آسیب‌رسان که رو به گسترش است، فابینگ شریک زندگی است که اشاره به به‌کارگیری گوشی همراه در حضور همسر دارد. هدف پژوهش حاضر ترجمه سنجۀ فابینگ شریک زندگی به زبان فارسی و سپس بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخه ترجمه شده در زوجین ایرانی بود.
روش: در این مطالعه روان‌سنجی و مقطعی، 433 نفر دربرگیرنده زنان و مردان متأهل (5/51 % زنان و 48.5% مردان با دامنه‌ی سنی 20 الی 50 سال) در سال 1402 موردبررسی قرار گرفتند. به‌منظور گردآوری آنلاین داده‌ها، از سنجۀ فابینگ شریک زندگی و پرسش‌نامه­ های رضایت زناشویی کانزاس و طلاق عاطفی گاتمن و برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزارهای SPSS-28 و AMOS-24 استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: به‌صورت کلی، نسخه فارسی سنجۀ فابینگ شریک زندگی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی قابل‌قبول و قوی را ازنظر اعتبار بازآزمایی (r=0.92, P=0.001)، همسانی درونی به هر دو روش ضریب آلفای کرونباخ و امگای مک‌دونالد (94/0)، روایی واگرا با پرسش‌نامه رضایت زناشویی کانزاس (r=-0.126, P˂0.01)، روایی همگرا با پرسش‌نامه طلاق عاطفی گاتمن (r=0.117, P˂0.05) نشان داد. همچنین یافته‌ها با حذف گویۀ 7، ساختار تک عاملی سنجه را با بارهای عاملی در حد مطلوب (بالاتر از 7/0) تأیید کردند.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج پژوهش حاضر نشان‌دهنده ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی مناسب نسخه فارسی سنجۀ فابینگ شریک زندگی در زوجین ایرانی است؛ ازاین‌روی سنجۀ نامبرده  می‌تواند به‌عنوان یک ابزار کمابیش تازه در زمینه‌های پژوهشی و مشاوره‌ای گستره خانواده در کنار دیگر ابزارهای ارزیابی، به‌منظور شناسایی و درک پیامدهای آسیب‌رسان کاربرد بیش‌ازاندازه از گوشی‌های همراه به کار گرفته شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation of the Psychometric Characteristics of the Persian Version of the Partner Phubbing Scale in Iranian Couples

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zakarya Etesami 1
  • Mohammad Rostami 2
  • Omid Isanejad 3
1 M A student in family counseling, Department of Counseling, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor of Counseling Department, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
3 Associate Professor of Counseling Department, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Smartphones and the Internet, with the advancement of technology, have dramatically changed people's relationships. However, one of the emerging and harmful phenomena that is spreading is Partner Phubbing, which refers to using a cell phone in the presence of one's wife. The present study aimed to translate the Partner Phubbing Scale into Persian language and then evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Partner Phubbing Scale in Iranian couples
Method: In this psychometric and cross-sectional study, 433 people, including married men and women (51.5% women and 48.5% men with an age range of 20-50 years), were examined in 2023. To collect data online, the Partner Phubbing Scale, Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale, and Gottman's Emotional Divorce Scale were used, and SPSS-28 and AMOS-24 software were used for data analysis.
Findings: In general, the Persian version of Partner Phubbing Scale showed acceptable and strong psychometric properties in terms of test-retest reliability (r=0.92, P=0.001), internal consistency by both Cronbach's alpha and MacDonald's omega coefficient methods (0/94), divergent validity with the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale (r=-0.126, P˂0.01) and convergent validity with the Gottman's Emotional Divorce Scale (r=0.117, P˂0.05). Also, by removing item 7, the findings confirmed the single-factor structure of the scale with optimal factor loadings (above 0.7).
Conclusion: The results of the present study showed the appropriate psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Partner Phubbing Scale in Iranian couples. Therefore, the current scale can be used as a relatively new tool in the fields of family research and counseling, along with other evaluation tools, to identify and understand the harmful consequences of excessive use of mobile phones.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • partner Phubbing
  • psychometrics
  • smartphones
  • couples

مراجع

References                   
 
Abeele, M. M. V., Antheunis, M. L., & Schouten, A. P. (2016). The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality. Computers in human behavior, 62, 562-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.005.
Água, J., Coelho, C., Lourenço, M., Patrão, I., & Leal, I. (2018). Partner phubbing (pphubbing): validação portuguesa. Actas do 8º Congresso Internacional de Psicologia da Criança e Adolescente, https://www.repository.utl.pt/handle/10400.5/28839.
Akın, A., Altundağ, Y., Turan, M. E., & Akın, U. (2014). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the smart phone addiction scale-short form for adolescent. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 74-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.157.
Alireza Arab Alidousti, N. N., Narges Khanjani. (2015). Reliability and Validity of the Persian versions of the ENRICH Marital Satisfaction (Brief version) and Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scales. Health and Development, 4(2), 158-167. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1443907 . [Persian].
Ariapooran, S., & Hajimoradi, R. (2021). The Role of Spirituality Well-being, Forgiveness, and Marital Self-Disclosure in Internet Infidelity in Couples: A Survey Study. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy, 11(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.22034/fcp.2021.61960. [Persian].
Bandalos, D. L. (2014). Relative performance of categorical diagonally weighted least squares and robust maximum likelihood estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 21(1), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.859510.
Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of marriage and family, 62(4), 964-980. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00964.x.
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in human behavior, 63, 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018.
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Measuring phone snubbing behavior: Development and validation of the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) and the Generic Scale of Being Phubbed (GSBP). Computers in human behavior, 88, 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.020.
Çizmeci, E. (2017). Disconnected, though satisfied: Phubbing behavior and relationship satisfaction. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 7(2), 364-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.7456/10702100/018.
Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Fraser, A. M., Fellows, K., & Day, R. D. (2014). “Media time= family time” positive media use in families with adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 29(5), 663-688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558414538316.
Davey, S., & Davey, A. (2014). Assessment of smartphone addiction in Indian adolescents: A mixed method study by systematic-review and meta-analysis approach. International journal of preventive medicine, 5(12), 1500. PMCID: PMC4336980.
Davey, S., Davey, A., Raghav, S. K., Singh, J. V., Singh, N., Blachnio, A., & Przepiórkaa, A. (2018). Predictors and consequences of “Phubbing” among adolescents and youth in India: An impact evaluation study. Journal of family & community medicine, 25(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.4103%2Fjfcm.JFCM_71_17.
Do Nascimento Teixeira, I., & de Assis Freire, S. E. (2020). Escala de Phubbing para Relacionamentos Amorosos: Evidências de Adequação Psicométrica. Summa Psicológica UST, 17(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.18774/0719-448x.2020.17.420.
Duran, R. L., Kelly, L., & Rotaru, T. (2011). Mobile phones in romantic relationships and the dialectic of autonomy versus connection. Communication Quarterly, 59(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.541336.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312.
Fuji, A., & Naderi, F. (2016). The relationship between social skills and religious beliefs with emotional divorce in female clients to psychological centers in Ahvaz. woman cultural psychology)the former woman and Culture(27(8), 23-36. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1670709 . [Persian].
Ginty, A. T. (2020). Psychometric properties. In Encyclopedia of behavioral medicine (pp. 1770-1771). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39903-0_480.
González-Rivera, J., Segura-Abreu, L., & Urbistondo-Rodríguez, V. (2018). Phubbing en las relaciones románticas: uso del celular, satisfacción en la pareja, bienestar psicológico y salud mental. Interacciones, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.24016/2018.v4n2.117.
Gottman, J. M. (2008). Gottman method couple therapy. Clinical handbook of couple therapy, 4(8), 138-164. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-09621-005.
Gottman, J. M., Jacobson, N. S., Rushe, R. H., & Shortt, J. W. (1995). The relationship between heart rate reactivity, emotionally aggressive behavior, and general violence in batterers. Journal of family psychology, 9(3), 227. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0893-3200.9.3.227.
Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2017). Texting's consequences for romantic relationships: A cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks. Computers in human behavior, 71, 386-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.051.
Haug, S., Castro, R. P., Kwon, M., Filler, A., Kowatsch, T., & Schaub, M. P. (2015). Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. Journal of behavioral addictions, 4(4), 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.037.
Khodabakhsh, S., & Le Ong, Y. (2021). The impact of partner phubbing on marital quality among married couples in Malaysia: Moderating effect of gender and age. Aloma: revista de psicologia, ciències de l'educació i de l'esport Blanquerna, 39(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.51698/aloma.2021.39.1.9-16.
Kreuze, E., & Lamis, D. A. (2018). A review of psychometrically tested instruments assessing suicide risk in adults. OMEGA-Journal of death and dying, 77(1), 36-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222816688151.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology, 28(4), 563-575. file://F:\\000Lawshe_content_valdity.pdf
Lenhart, A., & Duggan, M. (2014). Couples, the internet, and social media. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/620416/couples-the-internet-and-social-media/1601623/.
McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/ppm0000065.
Miller-Ott, A. E., Kelly, L., & Duran, R. L. (2012). The effects of cell phone usage rules on satisfaction in romantic relationships. Communication Quarterly, 60(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2012.642263.
Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2016). The iPhone effect: The quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514539755.
Nichols, C., Schumm, W. R., Schectman, K., & Grigsby, C. C. (1983). Characteristics of responses to the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale by a sample of 84 married mothers. Psychological Reports, 53(2), 567-572. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1983.53.2.567.
Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., & Raita, E. (2012). Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous computing, 16, 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0412-2
Patrão, I. (2017). Geração cordão. Lisboa: Pactor. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/154173793.pdf.
Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512453827.
Rahimi, Z., Zadeh Mohammadi, A., & Nasiri Hanis, G. (2018). The effect of group counseling based on unity oriented psychology on marital satisfaction and psychological well-being of couples. family counselling and psychotherapy, 8(1), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.22034/fcp.2018.60858. [Persian].
Rainie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2015). Americans’ views on mobile etiquette. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/618929/americans-views-on-mobile-etiquette/1599969/
Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in human behavior, 54, 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058.
Siegel, D. J. (2010). The mindful therapist: A clinician's guide to mindsight and neural integration. https://drdansiegel.com/book/the-mindful-therapist/.
Wang, X., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017). Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.014.
Wang, X., Zhao, F., & Lei, L. (2021). Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction: Self-esteem and marital status as moderators. Current Psychology, 40(7), 3365-3375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00275-0 .
Wang, X., & Zhao, K. (2023). Partner phubbing and marital satisfaction: The mediating roles of marital interaction and marital conflict. Social Science Computer Review, 41(4), 1126-1139. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211072231.
Yam, F. C. (2023). The relationship between partner phubbing and life satisfaction: The mediating role of relationship satisfaction and perceived romantic relationship quality. Psychological Reports, 126(1), 303-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941221144611.
Yildirim, C., & Correia, A.-P. (2015). Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire. Computers in human behavior, 49, 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.059.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار